I Saw an Ad where someone was promoting an AI that can help people humanize contents that were created by AI.
So the initial AI is used to write research papers for university students, but the problem was that the professor who was going to grade this research paper would also use another AI checker (which is also an AI) to see if the research paper was done by an AI, and if it came out 100%, the professor went ahead and failed the owner of the research paper.
So the goal of the "humanize AI" campaign was to ensure that people could pass off AI work as their own without being caught.
So I am not opposed to a student using AI to write their research; the issue is that research work is intended to be a form of rite of passage, sometimes a test of whether a student is qualified to go out there, in the job or professional sector, and be the best at what they do.
It would not be a bad idea to use AI to seek knowledge that humans lack, perhaps in the treatment of incurable medical conditions.
For example, if AIs can assist medical doctors in becoming practicing doctors by writing their research papers, why can not these AIs completely replace them and begin performing surgical procedures?
My point is that a profession like medicine should use AI to enhance knowledge, not as the foundation of knowledge. Imagine telling a doctor about your symptoms and they pull up DEEPSEEK to get an answer. Would you be willing to have such people perform surgical procedures on you?
Remember that you're in the place because you're trusting their years of experience and expertise, and it just turned out that the relied on AIs to do their home works and projects.
However, if these AIs are only enhancing their knowledge and teaching them beyond what they already know, that is the necessary advancement in medicine.
But then, can we ever have AIs go beyond the scope of human knowledge?
I do not think so.
AIs can only reproduce or duplicate existing knowledge. There is no newness, only recycling and reconstruction.
For example, why can not an AI create new combinations of medications to treat rare conditions? These can only be achieved through years of human research and testing various prototypes on different people. Having various subjects to study, and so on.
So, most of the time, the concept of AI is to recycle existing knowledge; however, this has serious consequences. Without human effort, AIs' knowledge and reach will be limited, and if AIs begin to take jobs, will not their reach be limited in, say, 250 years from now, due to their inability to tap into the knowledge-experience created by real humans?
Take a look at the GHBLI AI used by almost everyone it just shows that without a preexisting prototype, then AI is as dumb, and if we stop creating, then what knowledge can they feed back to us?
Take a moment to rationalize this concept; once you do, you will realize we are going in circles. For me, I think AI is going to be one of humans biggest achievement, but somehow we're using it in ways which we're not supposed to, and this is why everyone will never 100% for AI.
It's a controversial topic.
For years, we have talked about AI putting people out of work or rendering certain industries obsolete; I suppose that is why some people are opposed to it.
Now, a job owner will be pleased that they will have to pay less, but a person whose job will be eliminated will be saddened, so because there is no general agreement in areas like this, we cannot say "AI is the future" without caution.
A typical example of "take it with a grain of salt" is Hive. If we believe AIs are natural, they should have been part of this ecosystem. But why are we frowning at it here? The concept is that it is lazy, unreal, and unnatural, and many people do not want to replace it with the authentic human experience we have here.
Passing off AI tasks as my work is not something I will do. Unless for the purpose of enhancing rather than entirely replacing. If people are proud of AI, why try to humanize it? As I previously stated, this is a controversial issue.
Interested in some more of my posts
Why Is the grind getting harder?
Monopoly Is the Death of Civilization
Survival: Choas and Scarcity
Crypto: Gut & meaningful Connections
What is the primary barrier to entry in Web3?
What Are Some Things You Should not Do During A Bull Market Year?
